There’s been quite a stir across Pakistan regarding (PECA) the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Amendment Act 2025, which many see as a pivotal moment for the country’s digital environment. Now, this act wasn’t pulled out of thin air—it builds upon the original 2016 PECA framework but with some pretty significant updates. President Asif Ali Zardari gave it the final nod on January 30, 2025, and since then, it’s been making waves in how social media platforms operate and how cybercrimes are addressed.
People have strong feelings about it, though. While some applaud the stricter rules aimed at cleaning up online spaces, others worry about potential restrictions on free speech and privacy. This topic is splitting opinions nationwide.
1. New Regulatory Bodies: Power to Police the Internet
The Act establishes three key entities to enforce digital compliance:
- Social Media Protection and Regulatory Authority (SMPRA)
This body, created under the PECA Amendment Act 2025, will oversee platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and TikTok. Its structure includes:- Chairperson: The Interior Secretary.
- Ex-Officio Members: Chairman of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) and Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA).
- Five Appointed Members: A journalist (10+ years of experience), an advocate, a software engineer, and a social media expert .
Also Read: Pension Reforms 2025: New Baseline Pension System Explained
How SMPRA Works?
Issues directives to platforms to remove/block content deemed harmful, offensive, or against Pakistan’s ideology.
- Can impose fines, revoke platform licenses, or order full/partial blocking of non-compliant platforms.
- Targets content that incites violence, promotes terrorism, spreads fake news, or criticizes state institutions (e.g., the army or parliament).
Example: If a user shares a video urging civil disobedience or damaging government property, SMPRA can order platforms to block it within 24 hours.
National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA)
Replacing the FIA’s Cyber Crime Wing, the NCCIA will investigate cybercrimes, conduct forensic audits, and prosecute offenders.
Social Media Protection Tribunal
A judicial body to hear appeals against SMPRA decisions and adjudicate online content disputes.
2. Redefined Terms of PECA: Clarifying the Law’s Scope
The Act introduces precise definitions to curb ambiguity:
- “Aspersion”: Spreading false, harmful information.
- “Unlawful Content”: Material promoting terrorism, obscenity, or defamation.
- “Social Media Platform”: Any digital service enabling user-generated content.
3. Crackdown on “Unlawful” Content
SMPRA can now order platforms to remove/block posts that:
- Incite violence, hatred, or public disorder.
- Promote terrorism or false information.
- Target individuals, institutions, or religious beliefs.
Example: A viral video inciting sectarian hatred could be blocked nationwide within hours.
4. Stiff Penalties for Spreading Fake News
A new Section 26A penalizes intentional dissemination of false information causing fear or public unrest:
- Prison: Up to 3 years.
- Fine: Up to PKR 2 million.
- Both: For repeat offenders.
Impact: Journalists and activists fear self-censorship over ambiguous “fake news” criteria.
5. Transparency Measures
SMPRA must:
- Submit annual reports to Parliament.
- Undergo audits by the Auditor General.
- Disclose financial records publicly.
Also Read: GP Fund Withdrawal Process Simplified by Punjab Government
6. Controversy: A Threat to Free Speech?
The Act has ignited backlash from:
- Media Groups: Claim it stifles press freedom.
- Human Rights Organizations: Warn of digital surveillance risks.
- Political Parties: Opponents label it a tool for government control.
Legal Challenges: Petitions in the Lahore High Court argue the law violates constitutional rights.
The Government’s Defense
Authorities insist the Act modernizes cyber laws to combat hate speech, cyberbullying, and terrorism financing. “This isn’t censorship—it’s safety,” a government spokesperson stated.
Conclusion
The PECA Amendment Act 2025 reflects Pakistan’s efforts to regulate digital spaces but raises serious concerns about overreach and suppression of free speech. With ongoing legal battles and international criticism, its future hinges on judicial review and potential amendments to address constitutional and ethical flaws. For further details, refer to the cited sources.
